Joe Biden ?

[FONT=&quot]I need to apologize to the liberals in this thread... I mistakenly said that nobody attended Biden's rallies and there was no enthusiasm for him. I was wrong. It dawned on me this morning, that the riots and looting WERE his rallies and they were very well attended and there was lots of enthusiasm! [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Please forgive my error. [/FONT]
 
the democrats have been devising a plan the past 4 yrs on how to turn the elections in their favor without being caught. They knew they only had to be able to do it in a 4-5 key states. So this is what we have. Anyone who says there is no evidence of this is in with the plan and doesn't care about voter fraud. So what are the republicans going to do about it? My prediction, nothing. The republicans in congress and at the DOJ are weak @ass p...ussies. Not until they are all voted out will any of this BS end.
 
Truth is, both parties cheat. Whichever party happens to be least popular with voters, will attempt to hold onto or regain power by any means available to them, while the other party cries "fraud."

They're all corrupt, it's as simple as that. And if they're somehow voted out, others of their ilk will take their place. And if they're not already corrupt, they will be corrupted by their position, by the corrupt system, and by all that sweet lobbyist cash. And if all else fails, there's blackmail, death threats, and "suicide."

It seems Trump is/was an anomaly in a number of ways. And now, more than ever, we're seeing the almost limitless combined power of a majority of unimaginably corrupt and powerful foreign and domestic monied interests aligned against him.

Until informed voters can somehow compete with those monied interests, none of this BS will ever end.
 
Must see!

watch
 
Is there any evidence that these weren't valid ballots?
You mean besides the fact they were hidden under a table skirt and only pulled out after the count was supposedly done for the night, and all the observers left? If they were going to count for several more hours, why did they say it was over send everybody packing?
 
Yes, he is. However, there are a multitude of legitimate reasons for Trump, along with every informed and honest American voter, to cry "fraud."

Based on the court cases I haven't seen enough evidence to cry fraud. At least on a scale that would change the election results. Nobody is saying that fraud doesn't happen or hasn't happened to some degree in this election but as far as the amount Trump claims, he's failed over and over to prove it.
 
Based on the court cases I haven't seen enough evidence to cry fraud. At least on a scale that would change the election results. Nobody is saying that fraud doesn't happen or hasn't happened to some degree in this election but as far as the amount Trump claims, he's failed over and over to prove it.
The goalposts keep moving: First, "there's no such thing as voter fraud;" then, "there's no evidence of fraud;" then, "there's no proof of fraud;" and now, "there's not enough fraud to matter." ...and as long as apparently corrupt/TDS judges agree, you're satisfied.

...and still no mention of the Constitutional issues.
 
The goalposts keep moving: First, "there's no such thing as voter fraud;" then, "there's no evidence of fraud;" then, "there's no proof of fraud;" and now, "there's not enough fraud to matter."

The final will be "ok, ok, it was fraud, so what are you gonna do about it?"
 
The goalposts keep moving: First, "there's no such thing as voter fraud;" then, "there's no evidence of fraud;" then, "there's no proof of fraud;" and now, "there's not enough fraud to matter." ...and as long as apparently corrupt/TDS judges agree, you're satisfied.

...and still no mention of the Constitutional issues.

Can you quote me where I said all of those things? Also, even judges appointed by Trump are ruling against him.
 
Can you quote me where I said all of those things? Also, even judges appointed by Trump are ruling against him.
I wasn't quoting you directly, but rather the TDS collective. If those judges ruled otherwise, you'd dismiss them as Trump-appointed loyalists.
 
I wasn't quoting you directly, but rather the TDS collective. If those judges ruled otherwise, you'd dismiss them as Trump-appointed loyalists.

Then you should say so rather than make it look like I was saying it. The fact is those judges didn't rule in his favor and you're just playing make believe on what I would have said.
 
Then you should say so rather than make it look like I was saying it. The fact is those judges didn't rule in his favor and you're just playing make believe on what I would have said.
Fair enough. I'm sure you would/will accept Trump-appointed judges' rulings without question.
 
Back
Top