Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Ultimax vs Reference HO

  1. Back To Top    #1

    Ultimax vs Reference HO

    I am getting ready to upgrade the subwoofers in my truck. I plan to go with a pair of 10's in an under-seat enclosure. The Ultimax and the Reference HO both do well in small enclosures, my current box has .65 cuft per side before woofer displacement.


    Links for your convenience:
    https://www.parts-express.com/dayton...oofer--295-463
    https://www.parts-express.com/dayton...-coil--295-510


    The Reference HO is dual 4 OHM, so I can wire 4 voice coils in parallel to get a one-ohm load. The Ultimax is dual 2 OHM. I wonder if I would be better off to use a single ultimax in a ported enclosure.


    Which one would you pick? I am also willing to entertain suggestions in the same price range and would love any advice you all may have.

  2. Back To Top    #2

    Re: Ultimax vs Reference HO

    If I had enough power, I'd probably go with the dual HOs sealed - primarily due to the considerable vent length and displacement of such a small cabinet for the vented UM. But then, so much depends on your vehicle, sub placement, processing, preferences/tastes/expectations, etc.

    Hopefully this will help you decide:

    Green: 1x UM in 1.55 ft^3 at 26 Hz (500 watts) 22 Hz F3 (4" tube vent x 29.5" at 34.4 m/s peak velocity).

    Blue: 2x HO in 1.3 ft^3 combined (1,200 watts) 44.4 Hz F3.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screenshot (19).png 
Views:	282 
Size:	113.9 KB 
ID:	7526
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screenshot (20).png 
Views:	278 
Size:	110.7 KB 
ID:	7527
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screenshot (21).png 
Views:	235 
Size:	109.0 KB 
ID:	7528
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screenshot (22).png 
Views:	229 
Size:	110.5 KB 
ID:	7529

  3. Back To Top    #3
    Senior Member Smitty's Avatar
    Location
    FL
    Vehicle
    2019 Toyota 4Runner, 2019 Toyota Camry
    Posts
    271
    Join Date
    Oct 2019

    Re: Ultimax vs Reference HO

    I need start by saying I have not worked with or heard an Ultimax sub. I would go with the HO's mainly for same reasons stated above. I could be biased since I listened to an HO in a car last year and that is what is going in my newest build. Ive also recently been doing sealed and IB setups after years of exclusively ported so that could a factor as well. I know the HO can sound very good in a sealed enclosure.
    While we are on the subject of HO vs Ultimax, does anyone have any feedback based solely on SQ?
    Meh, it'll play.

  4. Back To Top    #4

    Re: Ultimax vs Reference HO

    Thanks so much for modeling that for me in WINisd. I have WINisd and have not had a chance to model the drivers. I am seriously thinking about giving a passive radiator a try.

  5. Back To Top    #5

    Re: Ultimax vs Reference HO

    Quote Originally Posted by DIY Audio Guy View Post
    Thanks so much for modeling that for me in WINisd. I have WINisd and have not had a chance to model the drivers. I am seriously thinking about giving a passive radiator a try.
    Yeah, a PR could be just the thing for the UM in limited space.

  6. Back To Top    #6

    Re: Ultimax vs Reference HO

    Quote Originally Posted by Grinder View Post
    Yeah, a PR could be just the thing for the UM in limited space.
    We don't see a lot of PR's in car audio. But it is a viable solution for the tight confines of an under seat enclosure.

  7. Back To Top    #7

    Re: Ultimax vs Reference HO

    Quote Originally Posted by DIY Audio Guy View Post
    We don't see a lot of PR's in car audio. But it is a viable solution for the tight confines of an under seat enclosure.
    It might bear mentioning that, due to their considerable added cone weight, PRs should only be mounted vertically.

  8. Back To Top    #8

    Re: Ultimax vs Reference HO

    Quote Originally Posted by Smitty View Post
    I need start by saying I have not worked with or heard an Ultimax sub. I would go with the HO's mainly for same reasons stated above. I could be biased since I listened to an HO in a car last year and that is what is going in my newest build. Ive also recently been doing sealed and IB setups after years of exclusively ported so that could a factor as well. I know the HO can sound very good in a sealed enclosure.
    While we are on the subject of HO vs Ultimax, does anyone have any feedback based solely on SQ?
    While the HO's can definitely hold their own (haven't heard my 10" HO yet, but based on what I've read), the UM series is no slouch either in the SQ department. The 8" Ultimax is used by Legacy Audio, in my Calibre speakers that I bought back in summer of '17. Suckers set me back $6,300 and they are worth every penny! The HNIC at Legacy Audio doesn't waste his time with anything that isn't truly SQ oriented with low-distortion. And neither do I.








    That's an 8" UM with dual 8" PR's with a s&#-ton of power behind them. Bass is awesomely clear, but it's the whole system that makes the bass sound great (with regards to music with bass-guitars and real bass-drums). It's funny because the heart of SQ-bass reproduction as I've come to find out, is in the midrange and lower-treble. The cleaner those are, the better real bass instruments are reproduced.

  9. Back To Top    #9
    Owner BigAl205's Avatar
    Real Name
    Alan
    Location
    Hayden, AL
    Vehicle
    2018 Chevy Silverado Z-71
    Posts
    5,701
    Join Date
    Feb 2013

    Re: Ultimax vs Reference HO

    I love my little Ultimax


  10. Back To Top    #10
    Noob NoDestiny's Avatar
    Location
    Idaho
    Vehicle
    2000 Honda Insight
    Posts
    89
    Join Date
    Oct 2019

    Re: Ultimax vs Reference HO

    15" Ultimax with 4.5 cubes, 1lb stuffing per cube, sealed in my little Insight (2-seater hatchback) and it does SQ with authority.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back To Top