Watching some of the crap going on about "election reform" - for the life of me, I can't understand why democrats are so against requiring photo ID to vote. The only possible reason that I can come up with as to why they don't want to require ID is so that it's easier to commit election fraud.
I don't want to hear the BS about how "poor" people can't afford to get an ID. That is absolute crap. Those same "poor" people are the ones walking around with a $1k iPhone, $100+ tennis shoes, etc. If you can't afford a photo ID, then I'm not so sure that you are capable of responsibly voting for something so important anyway. :-)
Anyone know of any other reasons why the dems are so against requiring photo ID to vote? It just seems like common sense to me.
Will be interesting to see what happens with the Arizona audit - although like I mentioned somewhere else, I don't think it's actually going to change anything either way - each side will just keep wanting to "audit the audit of the audit" - and they will never be able to agree on anything. It's pretty sad, actually.