Page 41 of 47 FirstFirst ... 313940414243 ... LastLast
Results 401 to 410 of 466

Thread: Ask an Acoustic Engineer (me)

  1. Back To Top    #401
    Owner BigAl205's Avatar
    Real Name
    Alan
    Location
    Hayden, AL
    Vehicle
    2018 Chevy Silverado Z-71
    Posts
    5,701
    Join Date
    Feb 2013

    Re: Ask an Acoustic Engineer (me)

    A strobe light and film camera with a synced shutter speed would catch the driver in a stand-still position, since it catches all light at once. A digital camera would catch it at a distorted angle due to the way it scans the image one line at a time.

  2. Back To Top    #402

    Re: Ask an Acoustic Engineer (me)

    Question pls. Mine is 3 ways front.
    Question 1:
    Which methos is better approach? and why?


    Question 2: when doing all of that matching and summing, do i use spatial measurements or headrest fix measurements?


    Method1:
    -Tune individual channel to match target curve
    - sum whole Left channel to match target curve. See sum at xover point and adjust TA for Left speakers. Link delay for whole left speakers, that TA now fix. after this consider whole left drivers is one Left Speaker.
    - sum whole Right channel, same process with Left. now is whole Right speaker

    • Sum 3 ways Left speaker and 3 ways Right speaker

    adjust TA thus dip could be move to less noticeable higher frequency above 1000hz


    method 2

    • Tune individual channel to match target curve
    • sum L&R tweeters, adjust TA, EQ Tweeter pair to target curve
    • sum paired midranges
    • sum paired woofers
    • now consider that 3 pairs are center 3 ways speaker
    • adjust TA between those 3 pairs to sum better at xover.





    Thank you.

  3. Back To Top    #403
    Noob Jdunk54nl's Avatar
    Real Name
    Jacob
    Location
    Phoenix
    Vehicle
    2014 F150 Limited
    Posts
    1,060
    Join Date
    Oct 2019

    Re: Ask an Acoustic Engineer (me)

    Quote Originally Posted by Kb86 View Post
    Question pls. Mine is 3 ways front.
    Question 1:
    Which methos is better approach? and why?


    Question 2: when doing all of that matching and summing, do i use spatial measurements or headrest fix measurements?


    Method1:
    -Tune individual channel to match target curve
    - sum whole Left channel to match target curve. See sum at xover point and adjust TA for Left speakers. Link delay for whole left speakers, that TA now fix. after this consider whole left drivers is one Left Speaker.
    - sum whole Right channel, same process with Left. now is whole Right speaker

    • Sum 3 ways Left speaker and 3 ways Right speaker

    adjust TA thus dip could be move to less noticeable higher frequency above 1000hz


    method 2

    • Tune individual channel to match target curve
    • sum L&R tweeters, adjust TA, EQ Tweeter pair to target curve
    • sum paired midranges
    • sum paired woofers
    • now consider that 3 pairs are center 3 ways speaker
    • adjust TA between those 3 pairs to sum better at xover.





    Thank you.
    As far as method, try and see which one produces better results for you! I always check all speaker pairs that will be interacting so kind of do both of what you are talking about.

    for measurements, eq needs spatial, time needs single point in space. You can’t time set time for more than a single spot, well you could set for multiple spots to have the best possible, but that means no spot is perfect and it would be a compromise. But that would be for multiple seats, not one seat. One seat one spot for time, but spatial around the head area for eq.
    2014 F150 Limited -> Kenwood DDX-9907xr -> Helix DSP.2 -> Alpine PDX-V9 -> SI M25 mki in Valicar Stuttgart Pods, Rear SB17's, Sub SI BM MKV's in MTI BOX. Alpine PDX-F6 -> SI Tm65 mkIV, SI M3 mkI in Valicar Stuttgart Pods

  4. Back To Top    #404

    Re: Ask an Acoustic Engineer (me)

    Quote Originally Posted by Jdunk54nl View Post
    As far as method, try and see which one produces better results for you! I always check all speaker pairs that will be interacting so kind of do both of what you are talking about.

    for measurements, eq needs spatial, time needs single point in space. You can’t time set time for more than a single spot, well you could set for multiple spots to have the best possible, but that means no spot is perfect and it would be a compromise. But that would be for multiple seats, not one seat. One seat one spot for time, but spatial around the head area for eq.
    For example, if i do TA for Left Tweeter with Left Midrange. I will use single point in Left ear. Run RTA to see summing at that crossover point. Correct? Right speakers TA use right ear position?

    Or all use mid headrest for check summing?

  5. Back To Top    #405
    Noob Jdunk54nl's Avatar
    Real Name
    Jacob
    Location
    Phoenix
    Vehicle
    2014 F150 Limited
    Posts
    1,060
    Join Date
    Oct 2019

    Re: Ask an Acoustic Engineer (me)

    Quote Originally Posted by Kb86 View Post
    For example, if i do TA for Left Tweeter with Left Midrange. I will use single point in Left ear. Run RTA to see summing at that crossover point. Correct? Right speakers TA use right ear position?

    Or all use mid headrest for check summing?
    all time needs to use same location, so middle or slightly left of middle is what I personally use. I always find if I use middle, everything is off to the left so if I place the mic basically where my left ear is, this fixed that issue. I believe it has to do with side window reflections causing extra energy on the left ear since it is close to that window and right ear is not.
    2014 F150 Limited -> Kenwood DDX-9907xr -> Helix DSP.2 -> Alpine PDX-V9 -> SI M25 mki in Valicar Stuttgart Pods, Rear SB17's, Sub SI BM MKV's in MTI BOX. Alpine PDX-F6 -> SI Tm65 mkIV, SI M3 mkI in Valicar Stuttgart Pods

  6. Back To Top    #406

    Re: Ask an Acoustic Engineer (me)

    Golden advice. Thank you.

  7. Back To Top    #407

    Re: Ask an Acoustic Engineer (me)

    What if any any factual basis might there be for the manufacturer to make the following statement?

    .... "By placing subwoofers of this quality in enclosures not much larger than the shipping cartons they come in (as small as .2 cubic feet for the 8” and .45 cubic feet for the 10”) the effective resonance point is raised and the subwoofer performs as if it were in an enclosure many times its size." ....

    https://www.cdtaudio.com/sep_compone.../qes820dvc.php
    "That's all, folks!"

  8. Back To Top    #408
    Wave Shepherd - aka Jazzi Justin Zazzi's Avatar
    Location
    Northridge, CA
    Posts
    670
    Join Date
    Aug 2018

    Re: Ask an Acoustic Engineer (me)

    Quote Originally Posted by Grinder View Post
    What if any any factual basis might there be for the manufacturer to make the following statement?

    .... "By placing subwoofers of this quality in enclosures not much larger than the shipping cartons they come in (as small as .2 cubic feet for the 8” and .45 cubic feet for the 10”) the effective resonance point is raised and the subwoofer performs as if it were in an enclosure many times its size." ....

    https://www.cdtaudio.com/sep_compone.../qes820dvc.php
    Half of that statement contradicts the other half.

    The statement (and others like it on that page) could be more truthful if expanded slightly such as "... performs as if it were an older generation subwoofer in a much larger enclosure".
    Measure with mics, mark with chalk, cut with torch, grind to fit, sand to finish, paint to match.
    Updated Justin tuning sheet (Justin and Erica tuning companion for SMAART and REW)
    Do it for them.

  9. Back To Top    #409

    Re: Ask an Acoustic Engineer (me)

    https://youtu.be/flj5XmyrLyI

    This is mosconi Cto explain how to use all pass filter.

    i can not understand why at 15:00 he could find the exact frequency 3500hz to do 1st order apf. Could anyone explain for me pls?.

    i only know how to see phase relate using RTA (skizer guide). Dont know how to measure phase.
    my right midrange and right tweeter does not sum well at xover zone (2460hz), it does not complete cancellation but sum 0db gain. What does it indicate? What frequency should i attempt to try all pass filter? Thank you.

  10. Back To Top    #410

    Re: Ask an Acoustic Engineer (me)

    My question abit confuse.
    Here is simplified version:

    Using RTA to verify phase and apply all pass filter:
    - If there is a big dip when sum, it indicates that there is nearly 180 degree out of phase at that point. 2nd order could be apply at that point.

    question:
    If there is no big summing dip, but 0db gain at summing point, mean it is around 120 degree out of phase, correct?
    1st order should be apply.
    Question: how to find exact frequency to apply 1st order apf? using RTA only, as i dont know how to measure phase.

    Thank you.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back To Top