Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 54

Thread: Why is "beating speaker frequency response into submission" via EQ a bad thing?

  1. Back To Top    #41
    DIYMA Janitor SkizeR's Avatar
    Real Name
    Nick
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    580
    Join Date
    Jul 2013

    Re: Why is "beating speaker frequency response into submission" via EQ a bad thing?

    It was your midbass drivers that were out of phase. Flipping them put them back in phase with the sub and the midrange. The biggest difference was in the sub to midbass transition.

    Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

  2. Back To Top    #42

    Re: Why is "beating speaker frequency response into submission" via EQ a bad thing?

    Quote Originally Posted by SkizeR View Post
    It was your midbass drivers that were out of phase. Flipping them put them back in phase with the sub and the midrange. The biggest difference was in the sub to midbass transition.

    Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
    So what would cause the drivers to be "out of phase" like that, assuming they are wired with the same polarity as the rest of the speakers?

  3. Back To Top    #43

    Re: Why is "beating speaker frequency response into submission" via EQ a bad thing?

    Could it be that one of those two drivers was somehow wired or labeled backward at the factory?

  4. Back To Top    #44
    Wave Shepherd - aka Jazzi Justin Zazzi's Avatar
    Location
    Northridge, CA
    Posts
    670
    Join Date
    Aug 2018

    Re: Why is "beating speaker frequency response into submission" via EQ a bad thing?

    Quote Originally Posted by jtrosky View Post
    So what would cause the drivers to be "out of phase" like that, assuming they are wired with the same polarity as the rest of the speakers?
    I bet a dollar they were not wired with the same polarity as the rest of the speakers : )
    Measure with mics, mark with chalk, cut with torch, grind to fit, sand to finish, paint to match.
    Updated Justin tuning sheet (Justin and Erica tuning companion for SMAART and REW)
    Do it for them.

  5. Back To Top    #45
    Noob Jdunk54nl's Avatar
    Real Name
    Jacob
    Location
    Phoenix
    Vehicle
    2014 F150 Limited
    Posts
    1,060
    Join Date
    Oct 2019

    Re: Why is "beating speaker frequency response into submission" via EQ a bad thing?

    I will check again but was super careful matching positive to red and checked polarity with the app before buttoning everything up. It checked positive just like the rest of the speakers.
    2014 F150 Limited -> Kenwood DDX-9907xr -> Helix DSP.2 -> Alpine PDX-V9 -> SI M25 mki in Valicar Stuttgart Pods, Rear SB17's, Sub SI BM MKV's in MTI BOX. Alpine PDX-F6 -> SI Tm65 mkIV, SI M3 mkI in Valicar Stuttgart Pods

  6. Back To Top    #46
    DIYMA Janitor SkizeR's Avatar
    Real Name
    Nick
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    580
    Join Date
    Jul 2013

    Re: Why is "beating speaker frequency response into submission" via EQ a bad thing?

    could be crossover settings, wiring, timing, group delay (doubt that)..

  7. Back To Top    #47

    Re: Why is "beating speaker frequency response into submission" via EQ a bad thing?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jdunk54nl View Post
    I will check again but was super careful matching positive to red and checked polarity with the app before buttoning everything up. It checked positive just like the rest of the speakers.
    You may already know this, but just wanted to mention that I had some "false positives" with my dedicated polarity-checking tool at one point - simply because I was checking the dash speakers and angled the polarity-checking tool too much because of the windshield angle. So it was reporting the polarity incorrectly (maybe due to reflections?). I've learned that you really need to get the tool as close to the speaker as possible, make sure no other speakers are playing (can be a pain with speakers using passive crossovers) and keep the tool as close to a 90-degree angle with the speaker as possible.

  8. Back To Top    #48
    BURNED OUT Hillbilly SQ's Avatar
    Real Name
    Chris
    Location
    Little Rock
    Vehicle
    2016 Ram
    Posts
    1,407
    Join Date
    Nov 2013

    Re: Why is "beating speaker frequency response into submission" via EQ a bad thing?

    Y'all are making polarity testing way more complicated than it needs to be as long as we're talking speakers with at least a little bit of excursion. Checking them before install with a small battery like a AA then wiring them up correctly should be all the verification you need. Yes some get labeled wrong at the factory and that can cause a ton of headaches. If the speaker pops out you're in phase. If it sucks in you're out of phase. As far as phasing when tuning way more people struggle with it than most will admit. Measurements are just one tool to get to the final result and as I was told one time by one of the few people I fully trust "sometimes the rta lies".
    They might say "don't try this at home" but nothing about not trying it at your friend's house.

  9. Back To Top    #49
    Noob Jdunk54nl's Avatar
    Real Name
    Jacob
    Location
    Phoenix
    Vehicle
    2014 F150 Limited
    Posts
    1,060
    Join Date
    Oct 2019

    Re: Why is "beating speaker frequency response into submission" via EQ a bad thing?

    Polarity on all speakers is correct according to factory coloring on speakers and amps.

    Checked everything this last weekend and I did confirm that the polarity is the same in the doors as the rest of the speakers. Positive is to positive and negative is to negative. I did even confirm this with a 9v battery. Everything moved in the same direction. The amp is also confimed that the negative wire goes into the negative side and vice versa with positive. The only thing I can think of is maybe the amp internally is wrong...but it is a pdx-f6 so that would be a pretty huge issue on the production line.....

    I even switched out the door speakers to test some other things and confirmed they were wired the same as the others. They also needed to be flipped polarity in the dsp software.

    I didn't get before graphs with REW due to the other things but when I was using rew and checking all speaker pairs with the new speakers, the polarity issue was confirmed even in the new speakers. This tuning session matched Justin's spreadsheets curve acoustically very well. So it isn't an issue with the frequencies not being a 24db acoustical crossover.

    I will describe what REW showed as I forgot to save those measurements.

    1) The graphs together were still louder but the crossover frequency was lower when polarity was flipped. As in the together repsonse still summed higher than a single speaker but was lower than when polarity was correct. It wasn't a huge dip like you sometimes get. It was just lower by a couple db. Noticeable on the graph but only if you take RTA with polarity one way and then the other way.
    2014 F150 Limited -> Kenwood DDX-9907xr -> Helix DSP.2 -> Alpine PDX-V9 -> SI M25 mki in Valicar Stuttgart Pods, Rear SB17's, Sub SI BM MKV's in MTI BOX. Alpine PDX-F6 -> SI Tm65 mkIV, SI M3 mkI in Valicar Stuttgart Pods

  10. Back To Top    #50

    Re: Why is "beating speaker frequency response into submission" via EQ a bad thing?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hillbilly SQ View Post
    Y'all are making polarity testing way more complicated than it needs to be as long as we're talking speakers with at least a little bit of excursion. Checking them before install with a small battery like a AA then wiring them up correctly should be all the verification you need. Yes some get labeled wrong at the factory and that can cause a ton of headaches. If the speaker pops out you're in phase. If it sucks in you're out of phase. As far as phasing when tuning way more people struggle with it than most will admit. Measurements are just one tool to get to the final result and as I was told one time by one of the few people I fully trust "sometimes the rta lies".
    Yes, it's easy to check polarity *during* the speaker install, when everything (door panels, etc) is removed and you have easy and full access to the speaker - but in this case, we're talking about *confirming* speaker polarity "after the fact" - where you can't necessarily see the speaker cone at all - or, even if you can see the speaker cone, you still may not have an easy way to monitor it's movement *while* applying the 9-volt battery to it's wires.

    This is where the polarity-checking tool (or app) comes in so handy. You can check polarity without being able to see the speaker cone at all - and/or when you don't have access to the speaker wires anywhere near where the speaker is physically located. Just play the repeated "tick" sound and press a button and you can tell if it's wired correctly or not.

    Different tools for different situations - that's all. :-)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back To Top