Joe Biden ?

[Grinder]

[rob feature]

The irony is pretty thick here considering all the bitch-ute posts

[Grinder]

[DavidRam]

The irony is pretty thick here considering all the bitch-ute posts

You don't seem to understand what propaganda is then... The MSM is the mouthpiece of the democratic-communist party:

Joe Biden says "Time to Heal" and BOOM it's a thing... "you know the thing."





Often times, though, the media can't make a "thing" out of what he says, because they don't know what that bumbling idiot said:

“I’ll lead an effective strategy to mobilize trunalimunumaprzure.”

[Grinder]

[Holmz]

...

Often times, though, the media can't make a "thing" out of what he says, because they don't know what that bumbling idiot said:
...

I have an idea... which may also work as they are all wearing masks anyhow. And it keeps the message consistent and clear.

[Grinder]

MEET THE NEW BOSS

The military-industrial complex is back.

Enjoyed the last four years of relative peace in the Middle East? Felt safer after ISIS was bombed into near oblivion? Thankful that your tax dollars aren’t funding arms for Jihadists? Well, get ready to dispense with all of that, because the neoliberal war machine is back.

Remember that weird couple of days back in 2017, when Trump ordered the bombing of the Syrian airfield? It was the one single time, over the last four years, that the mainstream media praised something he did. MSNBC’s Brian Williams called the missiles “beautiful” three times in the space of thirty seconds.

Well, Williams and his ilk are going to be creaming their pants over the next four years if Biden gets into office. Because the same people who masterminded the disastrous invasion of Libya, and the catastrophic policy of attempted regime change in Syria, are back like a bitch in heat.

Joe Biden: "America is back."

Biden has tapped Antony Blinken as Secretary of State to head up foreign policy. And he was immediately lavished with praise by the mainstream media. The Guardian gushed, calling him a born internationalist who will utilize his “urbane bilingual charm” to “soothe the frayed nerves of western allies.” They marveled at his previous appearance on Sesame Street, where he regaled Grover about the wonderous benefits and desperate hardships of refugees: “I’m talking about refugees. These are people who’ve had to leave their homes, because life in their countries was not safe for them.”

And why was that, Mr. Blinken? Do you think it had anything to do with the Obama administration, which you were a part of, toppling secular leaders like Gaddafi? Do you think it had anything to do with the Obama administration, which you were a part of, arming Jihadist groups in Syria in an attempt to topple Assad? The administration’s policies that you helped craft, created the power vacuum that was filled by ISIS; which, in turn, caused the international migrant crisis. You vehemently supported the calamitous foreign policy that created all these refugees in the first place.

Remember Gaddafi’s warning that the Mediterranean would become a sea of chaos? Well, that’s precisely what happened, because of people in the Obama State Department, like Tony Blinken. …





…. If Trump fails in his election challenge, expect the Middle East to be on fire within twelve months. Expect ISIS to make a massive resurgence. Expect western countries to be subsumed by another migrant crisis. Expect the threat of Islamic terrorism to intensify. Expect young Americans to be sent off to die for the sake of arms manufacturers. For the sake of neoliberal interventionist schemes that always end up in abject disaster.

America First is dead. The war machine is back. The military-industrial complex is back.

And where’s the Left? Out in the streets celebrating.

Another stunning victory for the Hashtag Resistance.

We just had an entire summer of protests and riots involving people infuriated by the treatment of brown and black people, only for them all to then go and vote for someone who is going to bomb the shit out of brown and black people and turn their countries into hellscapes.

Another stunning victory for the Hashtag Resistance.

(NSFW - language)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/o8-OtyUb9ok/

[Grinder]

Reasons why the 2020 presidential election is deeply puzzling
If only cranks find the tabulations strange, put me down as a crank
Patrick Basham

To say out-loud that you find the results of the 2020 presidential election odd is to invite derision. You must be a crank or a conspiracy theorist. Mark me down as a crank, then. I am a pollster and I find this election to be deeply puzzling. I also think that the Trump campaign is still well within its rights to contest the tabulations. Something very strange happened in America’s democracy in the early hours of Wednesday November 4 and the days that followed. It’s reasonable for a lot of Americans to want to find out exactly what.

First, consider some facts. President Trump received more votes than any previous incumbent seeking reelection. He got 11 million more votes than in 2016, the third largest rise in support ever for an incumbent. By way of comparison, President Obama was comfortably reelected in 2012 with 3.5 million fewer votes than he received in 2008.

Trump’s vote increased so much because, according to exit polls, he performed far better with many key demographic groups. Ninety-five percent of Republicans voted for him. He did extraordinarily well with rural male working-class whites.

He earned the highest share of all minority votes for a Republican since 1960. Trump grew his support among black voters by 50 percent over 2016. Nationally, Joe Biden’s black support fell well below 90 percent, the level below which Democratic presidential candidates usually lose.

Trump increased his share of the national Hispanic vote to 35 percent. With 60 percent or less of the national Hispanic vote, it is arithmetically impossible for a Democratic presidential candidate to win Florida, Arizona, Nevada, and New Mexico. Bellwether states swung further in Trump’s direction than in 2016. Florida, Ohio and Iowa each defied America’s media polls with huge wins for Trump. Since 1852, only Richard Nixon has lost the electoral college after winning this trio, and that 1960 defeat to John F. Kennedy is still the subject of great suspicion.

Midwestern states Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin always swing in the same direction as Ohio and Iowa, their regional peers. Ohio likewise swings with Florida. Current tallies show that, outside of a few cities, the Rust Belt swung in Trump’s direction. Yet, Biden leads in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin because of an apparent avalanche of black votes in Detroit, Philadelphia, and Milwaukee. Biden’s ‘winning’ margin was derived almost entirely from such voters in these cities, as coincidentally his black vote spiked only in exactly the locations necessary to secure victory. He did not receive comparable levels of support among comparable demographic groups in comparable states, which is highly unusual for the presidential victor.

We are told that Biden won more votes nationally than any presidential candidate in history. But he won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008. Yet, Biden somehow outdid Obama in total votes.

Victorious presidential candidates, especially challengers, usually have down-ballot coattails; Biden did not. The Republicans held the Senate and enjoyed a ‘red wave’ in the House, where they gained a large number of seats while winning all 27 toss-up contests. Trump’s party did not lose a single state legislature and actually made gains at the state level.

Another anomaly is found in the comparison between the polls and non-polling metrics. The latter include: party registrations trends; the candidates’ respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate.

Despite poor recent performances, media and academic polls have an impressive 80 percent record predicting the winner during the modern era. But, when the polls err, non-polling metrics do not; the latter have a 100 percent record. Every non-polling metric forecast Trump’s reelection. For Trump to lose this election, the mainstream polls needed to be correct, which they were not. Furthermore, for Trump to lose, not only did one or more of these metrics have to be wrong for the first time ever, but every single one had to be wrong, and at the very same time; not an impossible outcome, but extremely unlikely nonetheless.

Atypical voting patterns married with misses by polling and non-polling metrics should give observers pause for thought. Adding to the mystery is a cascade of information about the bizarre manner in which so many ballots were accumulated and counted.

The following peculiarities also lack compelling explanations:

1. Late on election night, with Trump comfortably ahead, many swing states stopped counting ballots. In most cases, observers were removed from the counting facilities. Counting generally continued without the observers

2. Statistically abnormal vote counts were the new normal when counting resumed. They were unusually large in size (hundreds of thousands) and had an unusually high (90 percent and above) Biden-to-Trump ratio

3. Late arriving ballots were counted. In Pennsylvania, 23,000 absentee ballots have impossible postal return dates and another 86,000 have such extraordinary return dates they raise serious questions

4. The failure to match signatures on mail-in ballots. The destruction of mail in ballot envelopes, which must contain signatures

5. Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting. Such is Biden’s narrow margin that, as political analyst Robert Barnes observes, ‘If the states simply imposed the same absentee ballot rejection rate as recent cycles, then Trump wins the election’

6. Missing votes. In Delaware County, Pennsylvania, 50,000 votes held on 47 USB cards are missing

7. Non-resident voters. Matt Braynard’s Voter Integrity Project estimates that 20,312 people who no longer met residency requirements cast ballots in Georgia. Biden’s margin is 12,670 votes

8. Serious ‘chain of custody’ breakdowns. Invalid residential addresses. Record numbers of dead people voting. Ballots in pristine condition without creases, that is, they had not been mailed in envelopes as required by law

9. Statistical anomalies. In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened.

If you think that only weirdos have legitimate concerns about these findings and claims, maybe the weirdness lies in you.

Patrick Basham is director of The Democracy Institute

https://spectator.us/reasons-why-the...eply-puzzling/

[Grinder]

Excerpt of article from September 24, 2020

… there are several mechanisms that are legal and constitutional that could enable Trump to stay in office without actually winning the vote.

The system of electing the president is complicated because it was not designed to be directly democratic. The Constitution calls for states to choose the presidential electors, who in turn gather to vote for the president. Over time, states have passed laws that ensured their state’s popular vote for the presidency would determine the electors. But those are laws, not a constitutional obligation.

Now, imagine the scenario during election week: Trump is leading on Nov. 3, but Democratic nominee Joe Biden gains ground in the days following. Republicans file objections to tens of thousands of mail-in ballots. Democrats file countersuits. Taking account of the confusion, legislatures decide to choose the electors themselves.

… Of the nine swing states, eight have Republican legislatures. If one or more decide that balloting is chaotic and marred by irregularities, they could send what they regard as the legitimate slate of electors, which would be Republican.

Democrats may object and file lawsuits. In some of those states, Democratic governors or secretaries of state could send their own slates of electors to Washington. That would add to the confusion, but that might well be part of the Republican plan. When Congress convenes on Jan. 6 to tally the electors’ votes, there would be challenges to the legitimacy of some electors. Congressional Republicans would agree that disputed states should not be counted. That would ensure that neither candidate would get to 270 electoral votes.

At that point, the Constitution directs that the House of Representatives vote to determine the presidential election. But it does so with each state casting a single vote. If the current numbers hold, there would be 26 state delegations that are Republican and 23 Democratic (with one tied), so the outcome would be to reelect Trump. Trump does not need to do anything other than accept this outcome, which is constitutional. ….

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...c67_story.html

[DavidRam]

Haha! Brilliant! ^^^ That should at least be Plan C or D!!