Page 14 of 23 FirstFirst ... 41213141516 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 221

Thread: Helix DSP.3 help thread

  1. Back To Top    #131
    Noob thedynoguy's Avatar
    Location
    Webster NY
    Vehicle
    2016 Hellcat Challenger
    Posts
    36
    Join Date
    Oct 2019

    Re: Helix DSP.3 help thread

    Quote Originally Posted by jtrosky View Post
    So far, I absolutely love the Helix. Did some VERY basic manual EQ (very few filters) and have been jamming to some old school Black Sabbath and it sounds so damn good.... :-)
    I told you the Helix was so much better than the DSR-1. Glad you're enjoying it...

  2. Back To Top    #132

    Re: Helix DSP.3 help thread

    Quote Originally Posted by jtrosky View Post
    Thanks.

    So you're saying to do it like this:


    instead of like this (which is how I have it now):
    Attachment 7894

    Doesn't that end up doing the same thing in the end?

    Although, I also noticed that the Helix DSP.3 manual says that it only processes the subwoofer FX stuff on Channel H. So if I want to use those Helix effects, I may just have to use a 2-to-1 RCA adapter and use a single Helix channel for the sub, instead of using 2 channels like I am now... Not sure about that - Doug mentioned above that it processes the sub FX stuff on all channels labeled as a subwoofer, but the manual says it only does it on channel H - so not sure which is correct yet. Will have to do some testing...

    So far, I absolutely love the Helix. Did some VERY basic manual EQ (very few filters) and have been jamming to some old school Black Sabbath and it sounds so damn good.... :-)
    As Doug mentioned, it applies the sub processing on all of the subwoofer channels.

    I have an underseat sub behind the passenger seat to fill in bass in the driving position where it's getting nulled in my car (2 seater roadster, "subs" are only inches away from the back of the seats in the rear panel). It works surprisingly well at evening out the bass in the cabin. I tried several different subs in the trunk but the underseat beat them all at the task. I just used one Helix channel and an rca splitter. Sum the left and right to the one output.

    https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B007HVDCWI/

  3. Back To Top    #133
    Senior Member jrwalte's Avatar
    Location
    Atlanta
    Vehicle
    2007 Corolla
    Posts
    293
    Join Date
    Oct 2019

    Re: Helix DSP.3 help thread

    If you aren't going to use the 8th channel in the Helix for something else, there is no reason to buy a y-adapter. Just have Helix output sub on 2 channels as Skizer mentioned.

  4. Back To Top    #134
    Noob dobslob's Avatar
    Real Name
    Doug Dobson
    Location
    Chandler, AZ
    Vehicle
    2018 Audi Q5, 2012 Jeep JK, 2005 VW Touareg, 2012 Kia Optima SX, 1992 Jeep YJ, 1999 Silverado, 1992
    Posts
    65
    Join Date
    Oct 2019

    Re: Helix DSP.3 help thread

    I always set sub up as a single channel and use a Y. It avoids any chance of setting the two sub channels differently or causing any confusion.
    Doug Dobson

  5. Back To Top    #135

    Re: Helix DSP.3 help thread

    Also, it seems that at least the DSP.3 does NOT do it's augmented bass processing on all channels labeled as a subwoofer. The manual clearly states that it only does the processing on channel H - it seems that it's "hardcoded" on the DSP.3 for channel H. So if you use G & H, you'd only get processing on half of the sub output. So a y-adapter seems the only way to get full augmented bass processing on the DSP.3. At least that is my understanding... It seems that the "labels" in the Helix are not actually used for anything other than to help you keep track of what channel is what - the software doesn't actually use the labels to make any decisions in regards to augmented bass processing.

    If you don't use augmented bass processing, then you can use two DSP output channels for a single sub just fine (it works fine for me using the "Subwoofer L" and "Subwoofer R" labels with channels G & H - but I don't currently use augmented bass processing. I can actually hear the sub output double when I unmute the second subwoofer channel, so I know it's working fine with the "Subwoofer L" and "Subwoofer R" labels on channels G & H. If I wanted to use augmented bass processing, I would need to use channel H only with a y-adpater at my under-seat sub.

    Again, that it my understanding after looking into this (manual, Doug, etc). Doug -please correct me if I got that wrong... After all, I've only been using the Helix DSP.3 for a very short time, so I am *certainly* no expert! :-)
    Last edited by jtrosky; 12-04-2019 at 12:02 PM.

  6. Back To Top    #136
    Noob dobslob's Avatar
    Real Name
    Doug Dobson
    Location
    Chandler, AZ
    Vehicle
    2018 Audi Q5, 2012 Jeep JK, 2005 VW Touareg, 2012 Kia Optima SX, 1992 Jeep YJ, 1999 Silverado, 1992
    Posts
    65
    Join Date
    Oct 2019

    Re: Helix DSP.3 help thread

    It is the safest bet for sure. There seems to be confusion about how the features apply to different processors, and with different software, but the labeled channels always work as designed from my testing.
    Doug Dobson

  7. Back To Top    #137

    Re: Helix DSP.3 help thread

    I'll make sure to take some actual measurements of the augmented bass processing results when using two DSP output channels (both labeled as a Subwoofer) and when using a single DSP output channel and a y-adapter on the DSP.3. That should tell us for sure whether or not the augmented bass processing works only on channel H or if it works on any channel labeled as a subwoofer - at least on the DSP.3 with the latest software. It sounds like the results may be different depending on the exact software version and/or the exact DSP model. Since this thread is specific to the DSP.3, it should be helpful for those with a DSP.3 going forward.

    Although, then again, I'm not sure if the results would even be visible when playing pink noise at a certain volume level. If I understand the augmented bass processing correctly, it basically increases the subwoofer output at lower volumes (not at higher volumes) - so it may not even be measurable with "loud" pink noise. I'll see what I can figure out though and post results.

  8. Back To Top    #138

    Re: Helix DSP.3 help thread

    Quote Originally Posted by jtrosky View Post
    I'll make sure to take some actual measurements of the augmented bass processing results when using two DSP output channels (both labeled as a Subwoofer) and when using a single DSP output channel and a y-adapter on the DSP.3. That should tell us for sure whether or not the augmented bass processing works only on channel H or if it works on any channel labeled as a subwoofer - at least on the DSP.3 with the latest software. It sounds like the results may be different depending on the exact software version and/or the exact DSP model. Since this thread is specific to the DSP.3, it should be helpful for those with a DSP.3 going forward.

    Although, then again, I'm not sure if the results would even be visible when playing pink noise at a certain volume level. If I understand the augmented bass processing correctly, it basically increases the subwoofer output at lower volumes (not at higher volumes) - so it may not even be measurable with "loud" pink noise. I'll see what I can figure out though and post results.
    I can only speak for my experiments, but when I set up my install with the two stock subs routed to Subwoofer 1 and 2 (E & F), and the underseat to subwoofer 3 (, the sub level worked on all three speakers, and when I tried switching the effect in and out with only the two stock subs (on channels E and F), it was noticeably switching on and off. Same goes for having the center on a different channel than the software states (G) - it applied the center effect accordingly.

  9. Back To Top    #139

    Re: Helix DSP.3 help thread

    Quote Originally Posted by auditorycanvas View Post
    I can only speak for my experiments, but when I set up my install with the two stock subs routed to Subwoofer 1 and 2 (E & F), and the underseat to subwoofer 3 (, the sub level worked on all three speakers, and when I tried switching the effect in and out with only the two stock subs (on channels E and F), it was noticeably switching on and off. Same goes for having the center on a different channel than the software states (G) - it applied the center effect accordingly.
    Thanks for the input - and you may be 100% correct. I'm just going by what it says in the DSP.3 manual, which may just be outdated or incorrect. I just thought that it was really specific as to how it works, so I assumed it was accurate. Here is what it says in the DSP.3 manual about Augmented Bass Processing :



    I do have another, completely un-related gain-related question...

    My head-unit is connected to the DSP.3 via the Optical input (via AmpPro4 Optical output). I *never* see *any* colors in the background of the "Channel Gain & Output Level" slider in the Helix software. The background is black no matter what volume level I have my head-unit at or what I'm playing (tones, music, etc). It seems like even at very high volumes, the highest the dB level shown next to the slider is -30dB or lower. I always thought it was strange that my amp gains needed to be set the same as they were with my 4v pre-out DSR1 (since the DSP.3 has 6v pre-outs). So.... I'm wondering if I would be better off boosting the input gain of the optical input (via the IO menu) so that I can then lower my amp gains. While I don't have a significant noise floor now, I just figured that lower amp gain is better - so why not boost the digital input signal and lower the amp "Analog" gains.... Especially since the DSP.3 channel output levels never seem to get anywhere near 0dB now.... I'm new to this digital stuff, but to me, boosting a digital input signal wouldn't add any noise, whereas boosting an analog signal on the amps does add noise.

    Thoughts? Does anyone else have the issue where they never see any colored backgrounds on the CHannel Gain & Output Level? Or is that simply because the output levels never get high enough to "trigger" the colored backgrounds?

    Thank you!

  10. Back To Top    #140
    Banned
    Real Name
    Hic
    Posts
    753
    Join Date
    Oct 2019

    Re: Helix DSP.3 help thread

    Boost it , if you can ! If U don't like results , unboost it .
    What have you got to lose ? YOLO

    The noise that enters a beam of light is Zero/zilch/none. Now magnetically induced noise in a wire made of copper , 'Skys the Limit' !
    Last edited by Queef; 12-06-2019 at 07:22 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back To Top