Grey alien interview sans audio

[Queef]

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/11/22/w...rnd/index.html

Fith force of nature ? They referred to thi..s unseen fifth force in action as a "photophobic force" , meaning that it was as though the particles were afraid of light.

[Queef]

Attila Krasznahorkay & his team maybe awarded $900,000 , a diploma , Nobel Prize for X17 !( Not exactly unimpressive !).

[Queef]

https://www.quantamagazine.org/why-d...ions-20191127/

An Axion is billions of times lighter than an electron.

[Queef]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/scitech...-particle/amp/

Additional evidence of a new particle , provides a surge in looking to verify .

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.scm...-force-physics

[Lanson]

Edward Witten's 1995 M-theory (leading candidate in 2017 for "Theory of Everything") and AdS/duality makes sense. Plasma , not so much.

Edward is the sole physicist to get the "Fields Medal" top prize awarded to mathematicians. He is 66 yrs old , 42 yrs old in 1995. Basically a geniuses genius !

https://www.quantamagazine.org/edwar...lity-20171128/

Plasma makes perfect sense, you can see it when you look for it. The important part there is to look for it. The work was not done by just one group (S0), it was a huge collaboration of scientists. The models have now been updated, and now you'll begin to see a change in the logic used by all the related alphabet agencies, as long as they haven't sold out to the Globalists that need Global Warming to exist due to humans for profit.

As always, follow the money if you want to see the root of corruption from that story.

[Queef]

OK
Seems like everyone will get involved as "History in the making" !

What is name of person/people who will be getting Nobel Prize for plasma ?

Is a "Nobel" in the near future for making history with "plasma" ?

[Lanson]

OK
Seems like everyone will get involved as "History in the making" !

What is name of person/people who will be getting Nobel Prize for plasma ?

Is a "Nobel" in the near future for making history with "plasma" ?

I'm not sure what you're talking about. This is the current general consensus for making the theoretical models upon which all research is performed. The models were previously flawed, because they omitted the energy from this and other related things. Example, the energy the Sun puts into our atmosphere via plasma conduction, the magnetic coupling between our Sun and the Earth's magnetic fields. This is now in the models, and changes the results. In order to get the changes in the models, there's tons of research papers you can review that cover each topic. I have mentioned this before, but the Suspicious0bservers youtube channel has a great primer video to explain all this.



So when you watch it, you'll notice this whole Dark Matter thing starts to implode, by the research itself. Prominent scientists start noticing that the current models can't really account for what is observed.

When we're talking about plasma, we're talking about charged particles in a highly energetic state, with magnetic fields and all that goes with EM. The models missed it initially, and have now been redone. The RESULTS of this will now show up in papers for years to come, and that's the point. All the previous info you "know" by reading/watching/hearing whatever, most of it was based on flawed models, models that skipped something because they didn't know what to call it. Why else call it Dark Matter?

This is definitely history in the making, but then again, every day is.

As for who wins a Nobel prize, I think we all know the Nobel system is as rigged as any election.

[Queef]

OK Lanson,
On the anniversary of Alfred Nobel's death, they will give out awards December 10th.

Do you remember the physicist who won the "rigged" award in "21" ?
https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1921/summary/

And in another "rigged" awarding the hungarian team resposible for finding the ("Fifth force") of nature will be given the same bogus prize that Marie Curie was awarded twice (physics 1903 , chemistry 1911). I am with you seriously . . . What did they ever do ?
Now , plasma , doh you know it makes sense ( RIGHT )?

[Queef]

If "plasma" is worthy it will be duly noted !

I'm not sure what you're talking about. This is the current general consensus for making the theoretical models upon which all research is performed.

The models were previously flawed, because they omitted the energy from this and other related things. Example, the energy the Sun puts into our atmosphere via plasma conduction, the magnetic coupling between our Sun and the Earth's magnetic fields. This is now in the models, and changes the results.



So when you watch it, you'll notice this whole Dark Matter thing starts to implode, . ..most of it was based on flawed models, models that skipped something because they didn't know what to call it.

Albert Einstein , Stephen Hawking , etc.., made history showing the way (Hawking never won a Nobel , his black hole theory was controversial in 1974 (the emitting of radiation).
Let's see what happens in near future .

[Lanson]

I'm just saying its rigged NOW in modern times or at least can be. If Obama can win the Nobel Peace prize in 2009 and yet be a total piece of warmongering, traitorous shit (you're going to find out here in a few days on that), its rigged.

If the Globalists have control of it, which they do, its rigged. They don't like losing and rigging is easy when you control all that they do, from. This is especially true if the prize would A: sway public opinion toward their synthesis goals, and/or B: create a revenue stream that could be controlled and profited from. As always, follow the money.

NOW, the Nobel Prize in Chemistry went to the most deserving man on the planet, I personally think, for this year 2019. John B. Goodenough is the MAN, and in fact I'd bet that solid-state electric batteries will change the world in just a couple years. The fact that Greta Thunberg was nominated for a Nobel Prize should prove the point succinctly that they can, in fact, be rigged. Hilary lost a rigged election, shit happens.

My POINT, if I had one, was that winning the Nobel Prize isn't something that automatically should vault you into some special space or fame. The context and information available as well as the opinion of the voters at the time the vote was cast should be considered. People that have clearly been observed as spokespeople for the Globalists should be viewed skeptically, and their motives reviewed.

Also, I at no point said it was a "bogus" prize.