How you run it? Opinions?
Just thinking to give it a try in a sealed enclosure.
Thank you!
Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk
Printable View
How you run it? Opinions?
Just thinking to give it a try in a sealed enclosure.
Thank you!
Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk
I ran one for years in a 1 cuft ported box on about 1200 watts. very nice sub.
I've always wanted one, but never any use for it, lol. Right now I got one SDX 10" that I've been meaning to test. Like other low-distortion subs, I'm sure it will please me, but I need to do something about that high Qts.
https://drive.google.com/uc?export=v...2-5lNIRt1LFlRh
Oscar, The published specifications for that CSS driver is .42 QTS. Why do you think that’s high? Did you measure it and get something much different?
That was a previous iteration, I can only assume:
https://www.css-audio.com/online-sto...fer-p110031748
https://drive.google.com/uc?export=v...wGjRoLPuWpnCE7
From my DATS V2
https://drive.google.com/uc?export=v..._s_seqA6pS6-5-
Even at 0.42, that's still high for my "ideal" preference since I am partial to vented boxes. Qts 0.28-0.32 always model better for me in vented/PR applications.
Ahh, good to know. I’m aware of a lower total Q affecting or being better suited for ported configurations yet I have had some great success with using drivers that are supposed to be better suited for sealed boxes when used in a ported box. I too just love ported boxes and am of the opinion that they are better for sound qaulity in an automobile because they produce a shit ton more output with less excursion and therefore less distortion when tuned low and with DSP intervention. I find it very difficult to find very low Q drivers that are designed for auto-sound because I’m guessing manufacturers are trying to appeal to both sealed box and ported box designs so they make a subwoofer that is a jack of all trades instead, and therefore sell more of them.
This is just my opinion based on some experience with a decent amount of subwoofer driver's.