Polihics

There's a difference between an infraction like running a stop sign and a felony though and it is one of the charges that is sending his lawyer to jail. It's not an impeachable offence, just more proof of what a piece of shit he is. Don't worry though, I'm sure we'll be hearing about the impeachable offences soon enough.
If they had anything, then what are they waiting for?

ca90ss said:
The dems doing shitty things isn't an excuse for trump to do shitty things too.
So you admit that the Dems should be investigated with equal vigor?
 
If they had anything, then what are they waiting for?
Investigations don't happen overnight. I'd rather the investigation be thorough rather than rushed.
So you admit that the Dems should be investigated with equal vigor?
Absolutely, if there's evidence of a crime it should be investigated regardless of the political affiliation of the offender.
 
Investigations don't happen overnight. I'd rather the investigation be thorough rather than rushed.
I would like to see the whole report

Absolutely, if there's evidence of a crime it should be investigated regardless of the political affiliation of the offender.
There now needs to be investigation into collusion with Russian agents by the Democratic party (via Fusion GPS), FISA warrant abuse, leaking confidential information to the media, and conspiracy to commit a presidential coup.
 
I would like to see the whole report
I think everyone would, 2 years for an inconclusive report is kind of a let down.

There now needs to be investigation into collusion with Russian agents by the Democratic party (via Fusion GPS), FISA warrant abuse, leaking confidential information to the media, and conspiracy to commit a presidential coup.

Fine with me, drain the swamp on both sides. Start with Pelosi and Schumer. Oh, and Biden too, if he gets the nomination it will pretty much guarantee trump a 2nd term.
 
I think it's hilarious, but I know it will never happen. He's just using it to expose the hypocrisy of many of the open borders types.

You're all welcome here!

...but not HERE, here...you're welcome over there, as long as you're not in my back yard, and somebody else has to take care of you.

Vote for me!
 
I think it is unfortunate that as a civilisation we are just like all are predecessors ! A low value is placed on humanity , whilst a high value is placed on technology

Once A. I. is in place , people`s jobs start to disappear won`t life be fun for everyone who has less than a genius I. Q. level ?
Of course, if your proboscis is not the same color as your other appendages you will be employed.
 
Last edited:
I think it's hilarious, but I know it will never happen. He's just using it to expose the hypocrisy of many of the open borders types.

Possibility of it actually happening notwithstanding, I'm more curious as to how you feel about the idea itself and whether or not you support it?
 
I would prefer a legislative fix, but that branch of gov is stuck on stupid.

That being said, I don't see a downside to his proposal. These sanctuary cities have INVITED them in.
 
What the dems do or say isn't really relevant here. The issue is that the president wants to release people who he believes are rapists, murderers, drug dealers and gang members into America in the communities of his opponents and you really see no problem with that?
 
What the dems do or say isn't really relevant here. The issue is that the president wants to release people who he believes are rapists, murderers, drug dealers and gang members into America in the communities of his opponents and you really see no problem with that?

By law, he's not allowed to turn them away. Why not send them to places that openly advocate for them?

I never mentioned a political party. I can see how the "stuck on stupid" could be construed as dems, but neither party wants to solve this. I don't see how people miss this. It's Donald Trump vs the political establishment. There are maybe a dozen congress critters who are with the POTUS and not against America. They put personal enrichment over the good of the country. Follow the money. That's why I rarely post in this thread. Until people see past the Potemkin village, we can't even have an intelligent conversation.
 
Since when has the law stopped Trump? He's telling people to break the law and he'll pardon them. I brought up the democrats because sanctuary cities are as far as I know exclusively democrat, not in reference to the legislative branch. I agree that neither side really wants to fix it as they both profit from it but it's also very apparent that Trumps approach given the sharp rise in number of immigrants as of recent isn't exactly working either. Yes, something needs to be done but to think Trump is the answer is comical. Maybe if he could put his ego aside and actually try to work with both sides rather than make it an us vs them situation then maybe he could actually accomplish something useful.
 
Right, who said Trump would pardon people? Same ones who said that Hillary would win, that there was collusion, that his wires weren't tapped, that he'd fire Mueller, Don jr and Jarod would be indicted? You really should be more discerning about news.
The cloward-piven strategy is being used at the border. In fact, isn't your governor down there now trying to bring more back?
 
Trump doesn't want to release them anywhere...but if the laws state that the HAVE to be released, then why not release them in areas that will receive them with open arms?
 
ok, so both sides profit, but Trump should lose his ego and work with them. :daniel:

logic pwns you...
 
Trumps all or nothing approach isn't going to work. If he works with both sides he stands a much better chance of making some progress. Some progress>no progress.
 
Trump doesn't want to release them anywhere...but if the laws state that the HAVE to be released, then why not release them in areas that will receive them with open arms?
So who exactly is it that is advocating just opening the borders and letting anyone who wants in? Sure you may find a couple examples but it's far from what the majority on either side wants.
 
Back
Top