let's look on this as a simple layer kind of thing.
The spending way, the democrat partisan blow-up of national debt, may be the smarter way. The problem is you can be too smart for your own good. If we can anthropomorph our economy, we could semi-attach that to the GDP, as the barometer where levels, and layers are laid.
I saw something Patrick wrote, about how the bigger debt people are the more successful, the most successful leverage the least for the most. Trump is not only well-versed in this, I have a suspicion that going the way he goes, this country won't have to withstand disgrace, or bowing to kings of nations who harbor and command control of terrorists. I have an insidious itch, that I'd like to see scratched and of the two candidates, only Trump will be able to scratch it.
This is superficiality, I suppose. But let's look at a thing. This country is in so dire a need for a conservative-principled, debt reduction artist that it put a woman in contention, as a sandbag, a handicap, a crutch to let the Republican party regain control.
That's our national consciousness, or conscience, telling everyone in no uncertain terms that before another liberal 8 years can deconstruct this country to a point we may no longer retain control of a singularity, our Khan-esque establishment of superpower stats, we have to have a break.
not a pause, because the liberal pitting and corrosion caused by a condition of conspirators reaching for some "hope and change" overshot that mark, leaving us 20 trillion in the red.
that's where the "smart debt goes big, small debt loses out" maxim may be betrayed, the country feels unsecured, the people in it don't understand how a negative balance makes them cross the poverty line but our nation not only sustains itself, it shows on paper a rise from a recession, our stock market blasts through that misunderstanding and we overvalue our investments without the requisite apprehension required for such a move.
and a superficial layer of success is supported by a complicit media, shining up statistics so that our liberal machine continues to push the ceiling, debt be damned we will have buoyancy, willing ourselves to pop-up from the nose-dive, unscathed by the dangers lurking behind Chinese "thousand years" thinking.
even now, there is a substantial group of voters who hinge their decision on the fact of just simply breaking the glass ceiling, as if we liberate ourselves of a damnation, as if we reconcile the past prejudices and outright discrimination women remain encumbered by, when all it is, is nothing but a fabricated sense of equality forced into our waking, a marker to show we've reached past previous attempts, or that we've crossed a finish line.
We will not, and we have not, and we aren't contingent on anything to move ahead. We are provided the opportunity to imagine what if, but that should be all that remains after November.